The effects of alcohol on sustanon 250 leucine for – real weight loss & bodybuilding benefits?
Search
Close
AI Search
Classic Search
 Search Phrase:
 Search Type:
Advanced search options
 Search in Forums:
 Search in date period:

 Sort Search Results by:

AI Assistant
Impossible to adher...
 
Share:
Notifications
Clear all

Question [Solved] Impossible to adhere to Google Play Store policy with WPDiscuz?

2 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
1,155 Views
Posts: 1
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
(@noseknowsnonotes)
New Member
Joined: 3 years ago
[#6981]

I have a Wordpress site with a simple app conversion that I've been trying to get published in the Google Play Store. I get rejected because I must offer an in-app solution  for users to block/hide other users and their comments. Even with several add-ons this seems impossible with WP Discuz? Does anyone have a solution? Seems weird to me for such a popular plug-in with so many paid add-ons to not arrange a way to comply with app store policies


1 Reply
Asti
Posts: 8210
 Asti
Support
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
(@asti)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 8 years ago

Hi noseknowsnonotes,

We don't follow you well. The wpDiscuz is just a commenting plugin. It has all the necessary tools for leaving comments on the website. 

If you want additional customizations contact us via sales[at]gvectors.com email address and send a list of requirements you'd like to have. They can assess the work and create it for you. 


Share: