Limited Support
Our team is currently on holiday, so support will be limited during this period. Response times may be slower than usual, and some inquiries may be delayed.
We appreciate your patience and understanding, and we’ll resume our usual support by the end of August.
Hi there,
Â
I try to disable the comment field, if the user has already commented on this post. But he should be able to reply to his own comment and other comments.
When I disable the form with this filter ...
function hide_form($output, $commentsCount, $currentUser) {
return '';
}
add_filter('wpdiscuz_form_render', 'hide_form', 10, 3);
... the form is disabled, but also the reply form.Â
Is there any way to do this?Â
Â
If I have a function to disable the main form, I will surround it with a check if the user has already made a comment. But I first need the form disable filter.
Thanks!
For everyone interested, here is the code to get if the current user already posted a level 0 comment:
global $post;
$args = array(
'post_id' => $post->ID,
'author__in' => get_current_user_id(),
'parent' => 0,
'count' => true
);
$comments_count = get_comments( $args );
This is not the solution, this is only the wrapper I need for getting, if a user already made a level 0 comment on the post. I still need the function, that removes the main comment form, but not the reply form.Â
Hi Zoker,
I'm going to ask the developers if there is a simple solution for this and back to you asap.Â
Please try this one:Â
function hide_form($output, $commentsCount, $currentUser) {
global $post;
$args = array(
'post_id' => $post->ID,
'author__in' => get_current_user_id(),
'parent' => 0,
'count' => true
);
$comments_count = get_comments( $args );
if ($comments_count) {
$output = preg_replace('~<div class="wpd-form[^"\']+wpd-main-form-wrapper[^>]+>.*?(<div id="wpdiscuz_hidden_secondary_form")~is', '$1', $output);
}
return $output;
}
add_filter('wpdiscuz_form_render', 'hide_form', 10, 3);
It should work fine.Â
@asti Yes that works, thank you very much! Can you please ask the developers to include a proper filter for that anyway? Would be a cleaner way instead of using a pre_replace with regex (especially if the html changes within a update, then the regex won't work anymore) 🙂
But for now this is perfect, thanks!
Zoker,
I'm really sorry, but this is not planned yet.
We'd really appreciate and be thankful if you leave a good review on plugin page. This is the best way to say thank you to this project and support team.
@asti Yes, that's why I asked you to create a feature request for this 🙂
Thanks!
Will do, thanks!
